Friday, January 30, 2009

Highschool Football Quotes

What weapons?


requests for certain things may even seem superfluous. If a person is killed with a wooden mallet or a perfect samurai blade does not change, the person is dead. Of murders.

Yet I think that some important it may have, if only to know if you need another reason to add to those already known, and whether the frame with a new design element we can see better, or even change.



"Al-Chifa Hospital, Gaza, we have seen phosphorus burns or injuries for bombs to ammunition. But we have seen the victims and we have every reason to think the use of new types of weapons, tested by the U.S. military, known by the acronym DIME (dense inert metal explosives), "said the doctors.

Small bottles of coal containing an alloy of tungsten, cobalt, nickel or iron, have an enormous explosive power that is dissipated within 10 feet." However, to 2 m the body is broken into two, 8-feet, the legs are cut and burned. We have not seen the bodies dissected, but we saw many amputees. There have been several similar cases in Lebanon in 2006 and Gaza in the same year, during the Israeli operation 'Summer Rains'. Experiments on mice have shown that these particles remain in the body and are carcinogenic, "they said.

A Palestinian doctor, interviewed Sunday by Al-Jazeera, spoke of his impotence in this case: "They have no trace of metal in the body, but the strange internal bleeding. A material burning their veins and causes death and we can not do anything." According to the first team of Arab doctors allowed to enter the territory and arrived Friday from the south, in the hospital in Khan Younes, were welcomed dozens of cases of this type.

Physicians Norwegian-say-were forced to testify about what they have seen, in Gaza in the absence of all other representatives of the "western world": "It may be that this war is the laboratory of manufacturers death? ... "

Full Article


Maybe a laboratory for experiments to test weapons for a not so far global revolt?

Only questions, no answers.



Tuesday, January 27, 2009

Milena Velba Vs Marilyn

PORCOPOLI

the hapless reader will excuse me if I sometimes carried away into the mists of local content ' national identity.



"As an island, situated in the Mediterranean and then away from the continent as a region sparsely populated with no major production plants, as culturally autonomous ethnic group and therefore" resistant "to the colonization and the integration, Sardinia is willing, today as yesterday, to be used by the ruling class as low-power air service. In this use, Sardinia, against other regions, certainly has an unenviable record.

Our island has been and is, in effect, a reservoir from which the rulers draw labor low cost for the wars askari, askari for the police, is for the middle-class families, and from robbery to which everything that can be robbed of the natural heritage.

A reservoir in which they are "paid" vulgar and corrupt officials, political opponents and ordinary criminals, a community of settlers, troops, special experiments on live dell'antiguerriglia, military bases with nuclear weapons, dirty industries .... . porcopoli. "


From: What bands? counterstory society Sarda, Volume I - Ugo Dessy

Sunday, January 25, 2009

Ver La Braga Metalica

The Oven



say that in Gaza, has used the infamous bright white phosphorus on the population is perhaps exaggerated, moreover, there is no evidence (? ). And if someone were to say that Gaza is likely to be made use of microwave weapons, it would also be exaggerated and unrealistic?



microwave weapons in Gaza, or imagination hypothesis


Fernando Termentini, January 21, 2009

The battle in Gaza over, but still many sources of information, including through film footage of the clashes, reproduce the problem of white phosphorous weapons. Ammunition is certainly enlightening to phosphorus was used during the clashes, including aerial bombs or artillery shells heavy, but argued strongly that this particular material has been widely used for offensive purposes, it might perhaps be risky and not simplistic.

military operations in Gaza have been characterized by episodes of tactical battle of the villages as we had been forgotten by the end of World War II, in close contact with the civilian population and in densely populated areas. Under these conditions using ammunition-loading devices such as special lighting loaded with white phosphorus, it becomes difficult to manage the fallout of incandescent drops to the ground, areal focus on objectives such as, for example, a bunker or an attacking position.

Under these conditions, then it may be that someone or something can be affected by phosphorus burns and you can not extinguish with water. In this case, however, the share of burning material would leave a profound mark on whatever comes in contact.

The images that came from the theater of war does not incontrovertibly confirm these hypotheses (? ) or leave think of a widespread and extensive use of white phosphorus against fighters or not against the Palestinian population (? ).

If, however, it seems, many wounded and many dead bodies present (the hypothetical form is a must for want of certain evidence) lesions whose origin is not secure and can not be traced to those caused by weapons normally used, as extensive burns, stripped to the bone tissue and soft tissue mummification, then you might think that perhaps even weapons have been used in microwave and / or plasma.

tools that should have been tested in Iraq, Lebanon and perhaps also at the first Gulf War against Iraqi troops fleeing Kuwait City. Weapons that shoot bullets instead of bundles of energy more or less powerful. Systems designed and built in his time on behalf of the American since the days of the Clinton presidency to have effective non-lethal anti-riot (the Sheriff weapon built by the U.S. Raytheon), later transformed into real offensive weapons acting on the radiated power.

matter affected by these weapons instantly loses all the liquid component and shrivels decreasing volume. Phenomenon that increases exponentially when the target is a man. Shrunken corpses with mummified soft tissues, the bony parts and low-cut clothing to be practically free. Conditions that have characterized many dead bodies found in Fallujah after the fighting house to house and in Lebanon during the 2006 war.

In Gaza, however, it seems that this summer, institutional bodies of the Palestinian Health, referring to the injuries of many types of injuries among the demonstrators, have suggested the use by the Israelis of non-conventional weapons. At the time, although he spoke in a superficial way of people with severe chemical burns, injured or dead with almost merged with muscles and internal organs destroyed. In fact, tissue drained of water, as is the organic matter subjected to the action of microwaves.

Systems like the Taser gun, which kills eight meters away, radiating energy of 60,000 volts, popular in the U.S. and in France. Weapons in the fighting in court settlements, in tight spaces, passages, in the basement at night and could be much more effective than conventional weapons.

much safer for those who have provided, as it reduces the risk of ricochet applicant when operating in premises close and surrounded by walls, too dangerous to friendly troops. Systems certainly more selective in choosing the target with respect light automatic weapons or grenades offensive.

hypothesis which has already been written during the war in Lebanon and perhaps more acceptable from a technical rather than assumptions that refer to the widespread use for offensive purposes of white phosphorus munitions.


Source: Pages Defense




PS At Tortuga, being with few certainties and a lot of dubious and uncertain, sometimes he happens to use inappropriately question marks. (?)

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

Deagle Airsoft Prezzo

Need to talk? Not only Israel


The intention was to write a short introduction to the phrase which appears below, and indeed I had well written, but once you read it again, the impulse was to trash, eal'impulso followed the action once the readings have become three, unfortunately, not even the ever-increasing amount of tobacco smoke can now turn the brain of tortuga. So I beg your pardon, but tortuga no words.


Why in the face of all this is still useful to talk about?







"It helps say something? Our cries stop the bombs? Our word save the life of any Palestinian child?

We think it is useful, yes, that may not stop a bomb and that our word will not turn into an armored shield to prevent the bullet from 5.56 mm or 9 with the letters IMI, Israel Military Industry, engraved the base of the cartridge hit the chest of a child or a child, but maybe our words will be able to join others in Mexico and the world and perhaps become a whisper at first, then out loud, and then turn into a cry that you hear in Gaza. "

Sunday, January 11, 2009

Vezon Et Kardas (modèle)






absolute scandal

24/11/2008

K. Selim


Gaza is choked, starved ... Ban Ki-moon and UNRWA are concerned, the Arab countries are minimal. It is a silent revulsion that encompasses the public opinion throughout the Arab world.

Why denounce Israel, a declared enemy of the Palestinians when Arab states attending, in a silent accomplice to the strangulation of Gaza's inhabitants? How to justify, in behalf of the rejection of "politics of the empty chair," Ehud Olmert Mahmoud Abbas meetings while Gaza is in the absolute insecurity? The substantive policy difference that exists between Fatah and Hamas can not accept that the official leader of the Palestinian Authority does not care about the suffering of the Palestinians to attend yet another meeting that would lead nowhere, that prevents Israel unilaterally to break the truce with a raid on Gaza and that does not determine anything about the extension of the colonies. What can speak - the word negotiation is so out of context - with Ehud Olmert Mahmoud Abbas? The way to weaken Hamas? If so, the results will reach the limits intolerable.

Why is not Hamas and its political organization or one of its choices. It is a question of the Palestinians in Gaza, children, women and men who are at risk of starvation and lack of care. No more room for politics in conditions where the basic right to life is threatened. And there is even less space for meetings of complacency among those responsible for direct tax to the intolerable situation of Palestinians in Gaza. Is there anything more ridiculous than to know that the Palestinian Authority has purchased advertising space in newspapers to claim the Israeli Arab peace plan?

The attitude of Arab leaders, in which one must include the elusive NPC without hesitation, is an absolute scandal. It 's strange to note that Mahmoud Abbas talk about elections, but the urgency is to fight the threat of death that falls upon Gaza. E 'intolerable learn that, according to the Kuwaiti newspaper Al-Seyassah, some Gulf monarchies, could provide assistance of 290 billion dollars to the United States to help address the financial crisis, without hearing people say that the glass of barbarism in Gaza is now full. How far will the Arab world? Why Egypt, as would all its people, does not break the criminal siege that has been imposed on the Palestinians? What do they fear? What do they need? What better coverage of statements by the UN under secretary general in charge of the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, John Holmes, which he called unacceptable 'measures that increase the difficulties and sufferings of the civilian population of Gaza and, as such, must cease immediately "?!

In reality there are no words to justify the attitude of the Arabs ...


Source: Bil'in, Le Quotidien d'Oran

Thursday, January 8, 2009

Intvitation Words In Tamil

Words / Words Only 3



As he told the "good" Gustav words have tremendous power, which if used with "care" can not only change a thought, but create and channel it in a certain direction, it goes without saying that this power must know how to handle, is not something you improvise in certain (or?) and why sorcerer's apprentices, modern and non-studying day and night as well as possibly change the cards on the table, to use a lighter term.

Wars are a glaring example, logically enough, and makes no exception, and God forbid, the extermination of the Palestinian conflict for survival became the only democracy in the Middle East. One of the tools of defense against this manipulation of the hearts and minds, as the good Santa (and others), is figuring out how to propagate evil and what media and prefers to use, and certainly a good way of spreading this incessant propaganda is the modern language. Words. He's probably right

old Galeano says that when we used to listen to and repeat the voice of the success (or power).

This article appeared in Le monde diplomatique March 2007 offering an example of how language information may be biased.



distorted words in the Middle East


Joris Luyendijk *


understand the what, where, when, who and how, after listening to any of the parties as to why, taking care to separate adequately the fact opinion ... It is not all that recognize quality journalism? And what the commercials promise of CNN, Fox News or Al Jazeera, if not objectivity? "We report, you decide 'we report the facts, you decide. Yet, after working five years as a correspondent in the Middle East, my conclusion is pessimistic: Western journalists can not precisely describe, much less objectively, the Arab world or the Middle East.

While following the letter of the rules of journalism, paints a profoundly distorted in the region. The main problem concerns the use of words: those that employ journalists for the public mean nothing European or American, or are simply biased. The best examples of these unknown terms are the words "occupation" and "dictatorship". Ignore the nature of a dictatorship is not only the preserve of the intellectuals or the general public.

When I was a correspondent, I received a rebuke from the chief editor of times: why get a visa to Iraq of Saddam Hussein called for so long? And because I was not yet gone to Libya? "Like, there is a visa? Insists, "And what about the demand made by a famous investigative journalist who sought the address of the Jordanian intelligence services ... Or about that amount that he wanted the receipts of all persons who had paid for my trip to Iraq during the former dictator ...

Still, the editor, the reporter of the news or the accounting officer followed the news closely. They read newspapers and watched television. But time at which the newspapers or television these explain what is really a dictatorship? The book I published last summer explains the fear, mistrust, brainwashing, corruption and destruction of the personal resources of self-love. The publisher is involved personally and has read it several times. He returned from the Frankfurt Book Fair full of enthusiasm: the book had spoken to a fellow Egyptian who was interested, I was about to break into the Arab world! He was bright, until the day he was explained that there was a contradiction in terms: a dictatorship can allow the publication of a book that has for its theme the heinous nature of this dictatorship? Even after having digested a hundred pages devoted to the culture of fear on which leverage the police states, the word "dictatorship" had been for him an abstract concept.

The word "occupation" may itself be meaningless to Western readers and viewers? Such a vacuum would explain why you multiply the pressures on the Palestinian Authority because it proves to "do everything possible to combat violence" when you do not hardly ever asks the Israeli government spokesman if "do enough against the occupation." No one doubts that the citizen in the West know what the terrorist threat, not least because policy makers constantly remind him. But those who explain to Western audiences the terror that lurks behind the word "occupation"? Whatever the year to which it refers, the number of Palestinian civilians killed as a result of the Israeli occupation is at least three times higher than that of Israeli civilians killed as a result of the attacks. But the correspondents and Western commentators, who evoke the "bloody suicide bombings," never speak of the "bloody occupation."

If the daily horrors of employment Israeli remain largely invisible, the 'information' coming from the dictatorship comes instead to newspapers and television Western. It then presents a second problem: When journalists describe the events, they use the term democracy. They use words such as 'parliament' or 'court', said the "President Mubarak 'instead of' the dictator Mubarak," and speak of the National Democratic Party when it is neither "democratic" nor a "party." They cite a scholar of the Arab world, but forget to add that it is controlled and monitored by the secret services. When they appear on the TV screen of angry young men burning a Danish flag in a police state, they call this a "manifestation" and not a media operation.

The disconcerting is that the correspondents who are in the Middle East know what it means jobs and a dictatorship. Work and live in Arab countries and the Palestinian territories, have friends, colleagues and family members who can not rely on any rule of law. These friends, these colleagues, these families are not citizens but subjects with almost no defense, and they know it. But how Western audiences may know, really know, how a similar system? How could it when the vocabulary suggests that democracies and the detective work were almost similar, with a parliament, a president and even the "election"?

The "hawk" of Israel, the Palestinians 'extremist' Some words do not say nothing for ordinary people. Other evoke different things from what you meant. Inherently misleading words: a few minutes of zapping on the satellite channels is enough to prove it. We must say 'Israel', the 'Zionist entity, "the" occupied Palestine "? 'Intifada', 'new Holocaust' or 'struggle for independence "? This strip of land is "disputed" or "occupied", and must be "given" or "made"? It is a "concession" when Israel fulfills a commitment contained in a treaty signed? Are called 'negotiations' between those Israelis and Palestinians, and if so, what is the scope of the Palestinians know that the word 'negotiation' implies mutual concessions between two parties more or less equal? There are no neutral words. What vocabulary take, then? Not easy to write an agency like this: "Today in Judea and Samaria / the Palestinian territories / occupied territories / the disputed territories / territories liberated, three innocent Palestinian / Muslim terrorists / were previously eliminated / brutally murdered / killed by the Zionist enemy / Israeli occupation troops / by Israeli Defense Forces. " Or, on Iraq: "Today, the Zionist crusader / American occupation troops / coalition forces attacked the bases of the Muslim resistance / terrorists / terrorist cell."

Western culture is optimistic: when you focus a problem, please propose a solution at the same time. But how to get out of this bedlam language, except perhaps more openly acknowledge the inevitable bias and filters of all journalistic work, and put an end to deception of the slogans, the result of marketing? We report the facts, you decide, all right. But we decide what you see and how. However, there is a category of words for which the Western media could do better.

Why a jew who claim the land that was given by God is an "ultra-nationalist," while a Muslim who does the same reasoning is a "fundamentalist"? Why an Arab dictator who chooses a policy different from that of Western "anti-Western," while the label is never applied in the other direction?
Imagine an American leader called "a radical anti-Arab"? An Israeli political
manager who believes that only violence can protect its people is called a "hawk." Have you ever heard of a "Hawk" Palestinian? No, it is an "extremist" or a "terrorist."
Israeli leaders who believe in dialogue are "doves."
However, a Palestinian who choose the same road is called "moderate" that suggests that, despite the violence hotels in the heart of every Palestinian, that has arrived, thanks be to Allah, to "moderate" its profound nature. And while Hamas "hates" Israel, no Israeli leader or party has never "hated" the Palestinians, even when their leaders take advantage of their government positions to preach the expulsions. Unless this is ethnic cleansing? Or an "involuntary removal"? Or a 'transfer'?

notes:
* Dutch journalist, author of Presque humains.
Images du Proche-Orient (in Dutch, Podium, Amsterdam, 2006).


Tuesday, January 6, 2009

Court In Kew Gardens Number




If you see a good morning by morning, the 2009 has little good to promise. Difficult even to say something sensible, so there are other items and useless also make the "commentary", even for this there are , much better, other items .

But since the Tortuga how others came out of hibernation has lost sleep, in the absence of any concrete action to be taken, he likes to spend these two words:



As you prepare your breakfast, think about the others,

not forget the food of the doves.

While doing your wars, thinks of others,

not forget those who seek peace.

While pay your bill water, think of others,

those who milk the clouds.

while you're about to go home, your house, thinks of others,

not forget the people of the tents.

While you sleep counting the planets, think of others,

those who can not find a place to sleep.

While free yourself with metaphors think of others,

those who have lost their right to express themselves.

While you think of others, while those further away, think to yourself,

and say maybe I was a candle in the middle of the dark.